This paper discusses the current status of judicial review in Iceland based on theory, recent jurisprudence and some older cases. It is argued that Icelandic courts openly and unhesitatingly examine whether laws are consistent with a broad array of constitutional provisions. The institution and practice of judicial review are largely uncontroversial, although the outcome of a handful of cases is disputed. However, it is argued that the role of the courts regarding judicial review is undertheorized and possibly undervalued. Neither the exercise of judicial review in general nor individual cases receive the necessary attention.

Keywords: Judicial review, Iceland, Icelandic constitution, international law in domestic courts.