Oppgrader til nyeste versjon av Internet eksplorer for best mulig visning av siden. Klikk her for for å skjule denne meldingen
Ikke pålogget
{{session.user.firstName}} {{session.user.lastName}}
Du har tilgang til Idunn gjennom , & {{sessionPartyGroup.name}}
Leder
(side 4)
av Einar Duenger Bøhn og Reidar Maliks
Vitenskapelig publikasjon
(side 5-33)
av Alexius Meinong
Über Gegenstandstheorie: In this classic paper from 1904, Alexius Meinong argues that a mental state must be about something in order to be a mental state, so since we can have ...
Engelsk sammendrag

Alexius Meinong: The Theory of Objects

Über Gegenstandstheorie: In this classic paper from 1904, Alexius Meinong argues that a mental state must be about something in order to be a mental state, so since we can have mental states about non-existing things, there must be such non-existing things. The paper appears here in Norwegian translation for the first time.

Keywords: A theory of objects, Intensionality, Existence, Subsistence, Ontology
Vitenskapelig publikasjon
(side 35-45)
av Andreas H. Hvidsten
En forspilt mulighet: In this essay, I consider a recent anthology devoted to the works of Hans Skjervheim. The central thesis of Skjervheim’s work is that objectification of human ...
Engelsk sammendrag

Andreas H. Hvidsten: A wasted opportunity: a critical reading of a critical reading

En forspilt mulighet: In this essay, I consider a recent anthology devoted to the works of Hans Skjervheim. The central thesis of Skjervheim’s work is that objectification of human beings and society in general has principled limitations. These limitations are highly relevant for the project of creating a social science. However, this problematic has largely been ignored or misunderstood within the social sciences themselves. Unfortunately, the authors of this recent anthology continue that tradition. I argue, that they fail to do justice to Skjervheim’s philosophy by not explicitly addressing his central concern: that the foundational issues in social science inevitably leads into the realm of ideology—and that the only way to get a sure footing in this realm is through dialectical thinking. As it stands, the anthology does not continue Skjervheim’s project, nor does it level any effective criticisms against it. For this reason the anthology is largely a wasted opportunity to engage with a thinker who still has much to offer.

Keywords: Skjervheim, objectivism, social science, dialectic
Idunn bruker informasjonskapsler (cookies). Ved å fortsette å bruke nettsiden godtar du dette. Klikk her for mer informasjon