Carboniferous–Permian conodonts and the age of the lower Cutler Group in the Bears Ears National Monument and vicinity, Utah, USA
Abstract
The Carboniferous–Permian (C–P) Cutler Group in southeastern Utah archives large-scale environmental changes along multiple facies belts, including major sea-level changes and continental aridification that intensified into earliest Permian times. Nevertheless, the stratigraphical position of the C–P boundary within the Cutler Group has been poorly constrained, until now. Here, we report the first biostratigraphically significant conodonts from shallow-water facies of the lower Cutler beds in the vicinity of Valley of the Gods, San Juan County, Utah. Bulk samples were collected from marine carbonate marker beds spanning up to 160 m of section through the middle Rico to Halgaito formations. Productive carbonates yielding diagnostic conodont elements included the informal marker beds: the McKim limestone and the ‘A’ limestone, representing a variety of shallow-water facies. C–P conodonts included Ellisonia conflexa, Hindeodus sp. and Adetognathus spp. We show that the first appearance of Adetognathus sp. B (Henderson), a species known from the C-P interval (latest Gzhelian – early Asselian) of the Canadian Arctic and east-central British Columbia, places the local base of the Permian at or above the ‘A’ limestone in southern San Juan County. The new records reinforce previous age assignments for the Rico–Halgaito transition beds established on the basis of land vertebrate faunachrons (LVFs) and offer a rare datum for correlating marine and terrestrial C–P faunal assemblages in western Pangaea.
Keywords
The Carboniferous–Permian (C–P) transition (ca. 299 Ma) was characterized by large-scale environmental changes in western Pangaea, including major sea-level changes and intense continental aridification. In southern Utah’s Paradox Basin, this transition is encompassed by the lower beds of the Cutler Group (Cross & Howe 1905), a 600 m-thick succession of marginal-to-shallow marine and torrentially deposited non-marine sediments situated between rising salt anticlines (Condon 1997). The northwest-southeast trending basin included three parallel facies belts – northeastern clastic wedge belt, mid-basin erg and evaporite belt and southwestern carbonate shelf (Ritter et al. 2002) – and ultimately terminated with the expansion of the coastal dune and loessite facies indicative of pronounced seasonal aridity (Soreghan et al. 2002a, 2002b; Mountney & Jagger 2004; Dubiel et al. 2009; Golab et al. 2018). In the vicinity of Valley of the Gods in southern San Juan County, Utah, the lower Cutler beds are sub-divided into the shallow marine Rico Formation and the predominantly terrestrial redbeds of the Halgaito Formation (Orkild 1955; Sears 1956; O'Sullivan 1965; Soreghan et al. 2002a, 2002b; Dubiel et al. 2009). Fossils from Valley of the Gods have been well studied, and those of the Halgaito redbeds preserve a vertebrate assemblage indicative of a C–P age, though variably assigned to Carboniferous (Sumida et al. 1999a, 1999b, 1999c), Permian (Vaughn 1962) or spanning Carboniferous–Permian (Scott 2013). In 2016, the natural monuments of Valley of the Gods were protected by the U.S. government as the Bears Ears National Monument, which has renewed interest in studying the region’s unique fossil resources (Huttenlocker et al. 2018; Gay et al. 2020). However, despite numerous studies of the region’s macrofossils and macroflora (e.g. Vaughn 1962, 1967, 1969, 1973; Sumida et al. 1999a, 1999b, 1999c; Scott 2013; DiMichele et al. 2014), the scarcity of fossil-bearing marine carbonates in the Cutler Group’s younger horizons has impeded our understanding of biostratigraphically informative marine micro-fossils and their bearing on the position of the C–P boundary (Sanderson & Verville 1990).
Conodonts, for example, were tiny, eel-like marine animals that are interpreted as chordates (Aldridge et al. 1993) and whose mineralized feeding elements are easily preserved and recognizable in marine carbonate samples. Their widespread distributions in marine facies and rapidly evolving forms make them ideal for biostratigraphical zonation (Herrmann et al. 2015; Henderson 2018). Prior work on C–P conodonts from the Paradox Basin of Utah and Colorado have been limited by poorly preserved material whose assignments to form genera are unhelpful (Baker 1933, 1936; Driese et al. 1984) and/or were restricted to older Carboniferous beds where deep-water forms could be easily sampled, thereby excluding the C–P boundary (Driese et al. 1984; Ritter et al. 2002). Workers have long recognized facies associations of continental shelf C–P conodont elements, favouring deep-water taxa with widespread distributions for biostratigraphy (Idiognathodus-Streptognathodus), and establishing the common forms Ellisonia and Adetognathus – well known from roughly contemporaneous marine formations in nearby New Mexico – as shallow-water structural types (Clark 1974; Davis & Webster 1985; Herrmann et al. 2015). Ritter et al. (2002) used such facies associations to establish a conodont sequence biostratigraphy for the Carboniferous of southern Utah, but this was ratcheted primarily to the better-known deep-water taxa of the Midcontinental sequence (i.e. Streptognathodus). The authors’ framework established robust correlations between the lower-to-middle portions of the Rico Formation and the Missourian–Virgilian stage boundary of the North American Midcontinent, placing a maximum age constraint on the lower Cutler beds (Missourian–Virgilian) while leaving open the possibility that the stratigraphically higher redbeds of the Halgaito Formation are considerably younger. Attempts to identify conodont elements in younger strata above the middle Rico Formation have generally been unsuccessful. Scott (2013) analysed bulk samples for conodont elements from the McKim limestone (middle-to-upper Rico Formation), but the samples did not produce diagnostic material.
In this report, we describe the first conodont elements from shallow-water facies of the lower Cutler beds in the vicinity of Valley of the Gods, southeastern Utah. Huttenlocker et al. (2018) related preliminary results of C–P conodont sampling in Valley of the Gods, but did not describe or figure these samples. The conodont elements represent shallow-water taxa known previously from the Missourian–Virgilian of New Mexico, but also include Wolfcampian elements in younger strata that show notable facies-specific associations. Here, we describe these samples in detail and offer new conodont evidence that places the C–P boundary within the Rico–Halgaito transition.
Institutional abbreviations: CM, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh; UCLA VP, former Vertebrate Paleontology collections of the University of California, Los Angeles.
Geological setting
Lithostratigraphy and sample interval
Bulk samples were collected from six sites during 2016 and 2017 where stratigraphical sections were also logged, forming a west–east transect from John’s Canyon to Comb Wash (Fig. 1). The samples were processed in a buffered 10% solution of acetic acid by one of us (C.M.H.) at the University of Calgary, and results were only briefly mentioned by Huttenlocker et al. (2018, 74). Samples (numbered 1349-1 through 1349-8 in Table 1) were recovered from marine carbonate marker beds distributed throughout the lower Cutler beds, spanning approximately 160 m of strata from the McKim limestone to the first major aeolian beds of the Cedar Mesa Sandstone Formation. Several prominent bench-forming limestones have been recognized as informal units in these lower Cutler beds, the first of which represents the uppermost unit sampled by Ritter et al. (2002): (1) the former ‘Shafer limestone’ exposed in the middle Rico Formation at the head of Honaker Trail, and which is not equivalent to the Shafer limestone of the Canyonlands and Moab districts (see O'Sullivan 1965; ‘Unnamed Bed’ of Soreghan et al. 2002a, fig. 4); (2) the ‘McKim limestone’ of Wengerd (1950), a thick (~1–6 m), fossiliferous bed whose top forms the Rico–Halgaito contact in John’s Canyon, Cedar Point and the central portion of Valley of the Gods; and (3) the ‘A limestone’ of O'Sullivan (1965), a thin (~1 m or less) but resistant capping unit that forms the ‘dome’ of Lime Ridge, and whose top forms the uppermost Rico–Halgaito contact east of Valley of the Gods and in the Lime Ridge area. These minor beds represent periodic, short-lived transgressions that occurred within a longer-term glacioeustatic-controlled regression that spanned into earliest Permian times. As such, the Rico–Halgaito transition is time transgressive, so that the upper contact of the Rico Formation west of W109° 50’ (top of the McKim limestone) is older than it is towards the northeast (top of the ‘A’ limestone) (Orkild 1955) (see Fig. 1).
Sample | Metres below CMS contact | Taxa/elements | Lithofacies |
---|---|---|---|
CMS, Cedar Mesa Sandstone Formation. | |||
1349-4 | 0 | Indet. fragments, actinopterygian teeth, monaxon spicules | Grainstone |
1349-3 | −35 | Adetognathus sp., Adetognathus sp. B, chondrichthyan teeth, elasmobranch dermal denticles, actinopterygian teeth and scales | Skeletal wackestone to packstone; fusulinids, brachiopods, bryozoans, crinoids |
1349-5 | −62 | Ellisonia conflexa, Adetognathus sp., elasmobranch dermal denticles, actinopterygian teeth | Bindstone |
1349-6 | −62 | Adetognathus sp. B, actinopterygian teeth | Bindstone |
1349-1 | −62 | Ellisonia conflexa, Hindeodus sp., chondrichthyan teeth, elasmobranch dermal denticles, actinopterygian teeth and scales | Bindstone |
1349-2 | −120 | Ellisonia conflexa, Hindeodus sp., Adetognathus sp., Adetognathus sp. B, chondrichthyan teeth, actinopterygian teeth | Skeletal wackestone to packstone; echinoid spines and gastropods |
1349-8 | −152 | Ellisonia conflexa | Skeletal wackestone to packstone; echinoid spines abundant |
1349-7 | −152 | Ellisonia conflexa, chondrichthyan teeth, elasmobranch dermal denticles, actinopterygian teeth, scales (rhomboid) and centra | Skeletal wackestone to packstone; brachiopods, fish scales, rare echinoids |
Palaeontology and age
A precise chronostratigraphy for the lower Cutler beds is hindered by few stratigraphical age controls. For example, magnetostratigraphy is hindered within the C–P interval by a long-lived period of reversed polarity, the Kiaman Superchron (Gose & Helsley 1972). Thus, micro-fossil indices from the marine marker beds may provide vital constraints on the age of the Rico–Halgaito transition. Whereas Baars (1962; Baars et al., 1967) suggested an unconformity between the Missourian and Wolfcampian strata, Loope et al. (1990) called this unconformity into question and Sanderson & Verville (1990) reported a succession of Missourian, Virgilian and Wolfcampian fusulinids from the lower Cutler beds of Emery County. However, the fusulinid assemblage of Sanderson & Verville (1990) was recovered from a core taken well outside our study area. The conodont sequence stratigraphical framework of Ritter et al. (2002) correlated the former ‘Shafer limestone’ of the Glen Canyon Recreation Area to the South Bend limestone (Lansing Group) of the North American Midcontinent at the Missourian–Virgilian stage boundary. This assignment was based primarily on the deep-water conodonts Streptognathodus pawhuskensis and S. firmus. The fossil vertebrate localities in the vicinity of Valley of the Gods occur mainly within the Halgaito Formation, but their associations with bounding marine marker beds make broader correlations possible. Scott (2013) considered the McKim limestone late Virgilian, and the ‘A’ limestone as either latest Virgilian or earliest Wolfcampian, reporting the xenacanthid Orthacanthus texensis from just beneath the level of the ‘A’ limestone at Castle Butte. The Birthday bonebed – a multitaxic bonebed positioned in the Halgaito Formation above the McKim but below the level of the ‘A’ limestone (Fig. 1 – includes taxa known from the Cobrean and Coyotean land vertebrate faunachrons (LVFs) of New Mexico and was interpreted as late Pennsylvanian (Virgilian) (Sumida et al. 1999a, 1999b, 1999c; Lucas 2006, 2018; Huttenlocker et al. 2018). Finally, Soreghan et al. (2002a, 2002b) reported a single detrital zircon age from loessites in the Halgaito Formation, but the grains were low-yield and were not analysed using methods that minimize effects of lead-loss, producing an unexpectedly young age of 283 ± 4 Ma (boundary interval between Artinskian–Kungurian global stages). Thus, portions of the lower Cutler beds may be as old as the Missourian and perhaps as young as the Leonardian North American stage. Overall, the conodont succession recovered here suggests a maximum age range from upper Gzhelian to mid-Asselian (ca. 300 to 296 Ma).
Palaeoenvironments
Of the major facies belts distributed throughout the Cutler Group, our study interval is centred on the southwestern carbonate platform – represented by the Rico Formation – and a minor clastic sediment wedge at its southern border that drained towards the north – represented by the Halgaito Formation. The carbonate systems can be further sub-divided into local lithofacies (listed in Table 1) on the basis of their matrix, skeletal grains and fabrics. These generally included: (1) skeletal wackestone to packstone reflecting shallow reef to offshore marine facies; and, (2) grainstone or microbial bindstone, generally associated with back-reef lagoon to intertidal settings (nearshore). A third carbonate lithofacies that is more common in the Cedar Mesa Sandstone is represented by the thin, brecciated, non-fossiliferous limestones reflecting freshwater or playa lake settings (Mountney & Jagger 2004), but these are not represented in our samples. Likewise, carbonate-cemented sandstones are also common both in marginal marine facies of the Rico Formation and in floodplain facies of the Halgaito Formation. In stream channels and estuaries, environmentally informative micro-fossils have also been encountered, including tiny microconchid tubeworm shells (~ 3 mm diameter) and teeth of small xenacanthid chondrichthyans, which have been interpreted as brackish- to freshwater-dwelling based on their facies associations and strontium isotope compositions (Huttenlocker et al. 2018).
Description and results
McKim limestone fauna
Compared to the lower horizons analysed by Ritter et al. (2002), relatively few fossils are found in the shallow-water carbonates of the upper Rico–Halgaito Formation transition. However, echinoid spines are characteristically abundant in the McKim limestone at multiple localities (John’s Canyon, Valley of the Gods), as well as brachiopods and gastropods. In Valley of the Gods, along the base of West Lime Creek, the McKim limestone crops out as a skeletal wackestone to packstone with abundant gastropod accumulations recording evidence of monsoonal, shallow-water storm deposits (e.g. echinoderm- and gastropod-dominated ‘proximal tempestites’; Samira et al. 2018). In addition to the echinoid spines, field observations of fossils have included the Carboniferous–Permian brachiopod Hystriculina cf. H. wabashensis and the bellerophontid gastropod Euphemites cf. E. graffhami, both reported previously by Scott (2013).
Micro-fossil samples were collected from the McKim limestone in John’s Canyon and in the west side of Valley of the Gods near Moki Dugway where the top of this limestone forms the Rico–Halgaito contact (Fig. 1). Conodont elements are represented by mostly shallow-water taxa, including Ellisonia, Hindeodus and Adetognathus, of which Ellisonia appears to have been the most abundant (Figs 1, 2; Table 1). At least 15 ramiform elements of Ellisonia conflexa (von Bitter & Merrill 1983) were produced from a sample taken from northeast of Cedar Point along the Valley of the Gods loop road adjacent to the Moki Dugway. Ellisonia conflexa is a nearshore conodont best known from the Late Carboniferous of southwestern North America (e.g. Desmoinesian to Virgilian stages of New Mexico; von Bitter & Merrill 1983; Armstrong et al. 1994; Krainer et al. 2003; Krainer & Lucas 2013). However, the species also ranges into the Wolfcampian of North American stages and to the upper Artinskian in the Canadian Arctic (Henderson 1989; Wamsteeker 2009) and Svalbard (Nakrem 1991). Its rarity in Wolfcampian deposits in the American southwest may be due to poor sampling effort in Permian-aged rocks in this region, given that prior studies have focused almost entirely on the carbonate-rich Carboniferous units (e.g. Armstrong et al. 1994; Krainer et al. 2003; Orchard et al. 2004; Barrick et al. 2013; Krainer & Lucas 2013). Hindeodus elements, not diagnostic at the species level at this time, were also encountered, but are similarly limited in their stratigraphical utility due to the long temporal range of the genus (Carboniferous to lowermost Triassic). Finally, Adetognathus elements (most of which are not identifiable to species) occurred in similar shallow-water environments (Clark 1974; Davis & Webster 1985) and have a long stratigraphical range (lower Pennsylvanian to Sakmarian of the Lower Permian). Several formal and informal species were used to develop a shallow-water zonation for the Moscovian to Sakmarian of the Canadian Arctic where fusulinids and small benthic foraminifers also constrained ages (Henderson et al. 1995; Pinard & Mamet 1998). The zonation was confirmed elsewhere in the Canadian Arctic (Wamsteeker 2009; Beauchamp et al. 2020), the Russian Arctic (Sobolev & Nakrem 1996) and in east-central British Columbia (Zubin-Stathopoulos et al. 2013). Species within this zonation have included Adetognathus lautus (Bashkirian to lowermost Gzhelian), Adetognathus sp. A (Gzhelian; Henderson et al. 1995; anterior inner parapet exhibits flexure), Adetognathus sp. B (uppermost Gzhelian to lower Asselian; Henderson et al. 1995; anterior inner parapet is thickened and smooth in adult forms), Adetognathus sp. C (Asselian; Henderson 1989; free-blade and outer parapet are disjunct) and Adetognathus paralautus (uppermost Asselian to Sakmarian; Orchard & Forster 1988; Henderson 1989; wide flattened parapets with numerous transverse ridges). Though not sampled in Ritter et al.’s (2002) study of the underlying ‘Rico’ beds, we show that the McKim limestone marks the local first occurrence of Adetognathus sp. B (Fig. 1; Table 1).
‘A’ limestone and equivalent fauna
Adetognathus sp. B (Henderson 1989) is also found in the highest shallow marine limestones locally, including the ‘A’ limestone. The ‘A’ limestone is fossiliferous only in a few areas, particularly where it pinches out in the Valley of the Gods and in isolated areas on Lime Ridge farther to the northeast. The few macrofossils suggest a bivalve- (Aviculopecten) and gastropod-dominated fauna (O’Sullivan 1965) with sparse fenestrate bryozoans and occasional fishes such as the ctenacanthiform Glikmanius (CM 90266) and palaeoniscoid actinopterygians. None of these fossils provide useful age constraints. Sedimentary features of the ‘A’ limestone include laminations and microbialite fabrics typical of autochthonous bindstone and, together with the fauna, likely reflect sub-tidal to intertidal environments. Based on a personal communication from E. L. Yochelson, O’Sullivan (1965:30) reported: ‘The abundance of shell fragments and the water-worn condition of many of them implies shallow-water and suggests that this may have been a [near shore] accumulation … Abundance of mollusks and the absence of all other fossil groups except a small fragment of a bryozoan might indicate deviation from normal marine salinity.’
Samples collected in the east side of Valley of the Gods (Setting Hen Butte) and Lime Ridge yielded a few micro-fossils, represented by Ellisonia, Hindeodus and Adetognathus (Figs 1, 2; Table 1). Ramiform elements of Ellisonia conflexa were most common (more than 13 elements), and rare platform elements referable to Adetognathus sp. and, notably, to Adetognathus sp. B were also encountered. Collectively, this conodont fauna is indicative of warm, shallow-water biofacies (Driese et al. 1984) and possibly fluctuating salinity conditions (Hermann et al. 2015). Adetognathus sp. B, as in the McKim, indicates an upper Gzhelian to lower Asselian age. High-resolution zonation of this time interval is defined by species of the genus Streptognathodus (Henderson 2018), which is normally found in more offshore biofacies, lacking in this region. Biofacies play a key role in the recognition of conodont biozones. Conodont biofacies boundaries are fuzzy as shallow-water taxa were abundant in near shore settings, but increasingly rare or absent in offshore, deeper water settings.
To the north of our sample, between Comb Wash and Arch Canyon where the Halgaito Formation grades into predominantly marine carbonates of the former ‘Elephant Canyon Formation’ (Baars 1962, 1967), the laterally equivalent facies of the ‘A’ limestone contain more abundant fossils that reflect offshore marine and shallow reef biofacies. This is consistent with the interpretation that the Halgaito drainage was towards the north (Baars 1962; Vaughn 1962, 1967). Fossils from the shallow-water facies in the Arch Canyon area include brachiopods, fenestrate bryozoans, crinoids and disarticulated elements of small vertebrates (including chondrichthyans, actinopterygians, rhipidistians and the aïstopod Phlegethontia) (Vaughn 1967; Sumida et al. 1999a, 1999b). Micro-fossils include only sparse fusulinaceans and the conodont Adetognathus sp. B. The record of Adetognathus sp. B in Arch Canyon further supports that these facies are laterally equivalent to the uppermost Rico–Halgaito transition in the south and that this conodont may be widespread in both nearshore sub-tidal/intertidal and some offshore reef facies (Wamsteeker 2009).
Another direction for increased chronostratigraphical resolution involves astronomical tuning of the rock record in combination with radiometric dates (Schmitz & Davydov 2012). Beauchamp et al. (2020) recognize numerous long eccentricity 405 Kyr cyclothems from Gzhelian to Asselian in the Canadian Arctic on the basis of carbonate sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy and link these with conodont temporal ranges. For example, the range of Adetognathus sp. B can be tuned to 300 to 297.7 Ma in the Canadian Arctic. Ritter (1995) shows 47 shale-limestone rhythms from the Eudora Shale (approximately base-Gzhelian) to Bennett Shale (base-Permian). The Gzhelian is 4.8 Myrs in duration (Fig. 3) suggesting that these rhythms represent 100 Kyrs short eccentricity cycles. Preliminary tuned ages can be provided for some key taxa in the mid-west succession including Streptognathodus virgilicus (302.3 to 299.6 Ma) and S. pawhuskensis (303.7 to 299.6 Ma); both of these taxa are immediately overlain by S. brownvillensis (299.6 to 299.3 Ma). This suggests that any samples in which these Streptognathodus species co-occur with Adetognathus sp. B, must be very close to the FAD of the latter species.
Discussion and conclusions
Age of the Rico–Halgaito transition beds
The conodont records further constrain ages assigned to the major marker beds in the lower portion of the Cutler Group (Fig. 3). Prior work has identified a maximum age of the middle Rico Formation by placing the Missourian–Virgilian stage boundary at the former ‘Shafer limestone’ (Ritter et al. 2002; ‘Unnamed Bed’ of Soreghan et al. 2002a, fig. 4), correlative to the South Bend limestone (Lansing Group) of the Midcontinent. Preliminary sampling further up section by Huttenlocker et al. (2018) targeted the McKim and ‘A’ limestones and suggested minimum ages of latest Pennsylvanian (Virgilian) for these units on the basis of Ellisonia and Adetognathus. Elsewhere in the Four Corners region, these taxa have been reported from the Virgilian Atrasado Formation and lower Red Tanks Member of the Bursum Formation, central New Mexico (Orchard et al. 2004; Barrick et al. 2013; Krainer & Lucas 2013; Lucas et al. 2013), as well as the Oso Ridge Member underlying the Abo Formation, Zuni Mountains, west-central New Mexico (Armstrong et al. 1994; Krainer et al. 2003). Orchard et al. (2004) illustrated Streptognathodus cf. virgilicus and S. pawhuskaensis deflectus as well as a transitional form of Adetognathus sp. A (their fig. 2.11-12) in the upper Atrasado Formation and correlate to mid-Virgilian; the cycle tuned age based on the Streptognathodus species (Ritter 1995) is 302.4–302.1 Ma. Chernykh (2005) described a comparable fauna in Bed 13 (mid-Gzhelian) of the Usolka section in the Urals of Russia; the interpolated radiometric age (Schmitz & Davydov 2012) is 301.2 Ma. A specimen of Adetognathus sp. B comparable to our material was reported from the Red Tanks Member (Orchard et al. 2004; fig. 2.6-7) below a second Streptognathodus horizon that included Streptognathodus cf. S. variabilis (their fig. 2.1-2) and S. cf. S. bellus (their fig. 2.3-4). Chernykh (2005) describes a comparable fauna from Usolka section Bed 15 (uppermost Gzhelian), which has an interpolated radiometric age (Schmitz & Davydov 2012) of 299.5. Therefore, the Red Tanks occurrence of Adetognathus sp. B is upper Gzhelian; however, the taxon is also recognized higher in the Asselian of Arctic and western Canada where it is more common (Henderson 1989; Zubin-Stathopoulos et al. 2013; Beauchamp et al. 2020). Consistent with the newly reported conodonts, the vertebrate assemblage that is bracketed by the McKim and ‘A’ limestones also supports a Virgilian age, including Cobrean and Coyotean LVF taxa: Sagenodus copeanus, basal diadectomorphs and the synapsids Ophiacodon navajovicus and Sphenacodon, among others (Huttenlocker et al. 2018, figs 15,16). The Coyotean LVF, whose base is defined by the first appearance of the abundant Sphenacodon, spans the C–P transition in the Four Corners region (Lucas 2006, 2018).
The ‘A’ limestone, which forms the uppermost bed of the Rico Formation east of W109° 50ʹ (Orkild 1955) includes marine vertebrates (palaeoniscoids, the ctenacanthiform Glikmanius) and invertebrate macro- and micro-fossils indicative of a C–P age. Moreover, Adetognathus sp. B is also found in this unit. The first appearance of Adetognathus sp. B is upper Gzhelian and is common in the Lower Permian in Siberia and the Sverdrup Basin of the Canadian Arctic (Fig. 3). The lack of Adetognathus sp. A in these samples could support an Early Permian age, but additional samples with more specimens would be necessary to confirm this absence as evidence. Therefore, it is reasonable to interpret that the Carboniferous–Permian boundary is found within the range of Adetognathus sp. B, which occurs from the McKim to the ‘A’ limestone. It is also consistent with the hypothesis that the C–P boundary is placed in the middle-to-upper Halgaito Formation as suggested by Scott (2013) (most likely above the level of the Birthday bonebed near or encompassing the ‘A’ limestone). The co-occurrences of Ellisonia conflexa, Hindeodus and Adetognathus sp. B within the ‘A’ limestone correspond to Sverdrup Basin P3 zone of Henderson (1989), which is now interpreted to span the C-P boundary (S. longus-A. sp. B to lower S. constrictus zones; Fig. 3).
Conclusions
Our conodont records from the lower Cutler beds place the C–P boundary at or near the level of the ‘A’ limestone. This is supported by the discovery of Adetognathus sp. B in the McKim and ‘A’ limestones and equivalent beds towards the top of the shallow marine succession in offshore reef to intertidal settings. Its occurrence in the ‘A’ limestone in the Lime Ridge area may demarcate the local base of the Permian in the overlying redbeds of the uppermost Halgaito Formation, which is slightly higher stratigraphically than the recently published latest Virgilian bonebed assemblage in Valley of the Gods (Huttenlocker et al. 2018). The bonebed assemblage and numerous isolated localities in the Halgaito Formation (Vaughn 1962; Sumida et al. 1999a, 1999b, 1999c) most likely correspond to the C–P Coyotean LVF. Our findings also support the likelihood that isolated vertebrate occurrences in the terrestrial facies above the ‘A’ limestone, including a record of the synapsid Dimetrodon at Lime Ridge (CM 47795/UCLA VP 1728; Vaughn 1969, 16–17), are Early Permian (Wolfcampian) in age. Further collecting in southern Utah is needed to identify Streptognathodus species that form the basis of the biozonation of the Early Permian-aged type sections in the Russian Urals (Chernykh 2006; Henderson 2018) and in the U.S. midcontinent (Wardlaw 2005; Boardman et al. 2009; Wardlaw & Nestell 2014). These would offer additional evidence for our placement of the C–P boundary, while offering the potential for further biozonation in younger Permian strata of the former ‘Elephant Canyon Formation’ farther to the north in the basin centre.
Acknowledgments
We thank the 2014-2016 National Geographic team: C. B. Cecil, D. Chaney, W. DiMichele, M. Gibling, T. Schlotterbeck and D. Tobey. We also thank our Utah collaborators R. Irmis, D. Rasmussen, K. Scott and S. Sumida for additional support and feedback on local Cutler geology and palaeontology. Additional field assistance during 2017-2019 by R. Black and Jet, J. Driebergen, J. Jung and Darwin and Owen Sumida. We are thankful to the participants of the 2018 Society of Vertebrate Paleontology ‘Bears Ears National Monument’ Field Trip, including C. Meyer (University of Basel) for his useful discussions on the local sedimentary geology and storm deposits. AKH has been funded by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s National Conservation Lands grant #L17AC00064 (2017-2019) and the Canyonlands Natural History Association; DSB was funded by the National Geographic Society. The conodont processing by CMH was supported by an NSERC Discovery Grant.
References
Aldridge, R.J., Briggs, D.E.G., Smith, M.P., Clarkson, E.N.K. & Clark, D.L. 1993: The anatomy of Conodonts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B 340, 405–421.
Armstrong, A.K., Stamm, R.G., Kottlowski, F.E., Mamet, B.L., Dutro, J.T. & Weary, D.J. 1994: Facies and age of the Oso Ridge Member (new), Abo Formation, Zuni Mountains, New Mexico. New Mexico Geology 16, 25–30.
Baars, D.L. 1962: Permian system of Colorado Plateau. AAPG Bulletin 46, 149–218.
Baars, D.L., Parker, J.W. & Chronic, J. 1967: Revised stratigraphic nomenclature of Pennsylvanian System, Paradox basin. AAPG Bulletin 51, 393–403.
Baker, A.A. 1933: Geology and oil possibilities of the Moab district, Grand and San Juan counties, Utah. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 841, 1–95.
Baker, A.A. 1936: Geology of the Monument Valley-Navajo Mountain Region, San Juan County, Utah. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 865, 1–103.
Barrick, J.E., Lucas, S.G. & Krainer, K. 2013: Conodonts of the Atrasado Formation (uppermost Middle to Upper Pennsylvanian), Cerros de Amado region, central New Mexico, USA. The Carboniferous-Permian Transition in Central New Mexico: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, Bulletin 59, 239–252.
Beauchamp, B., Calvo Gonzalez, D., Henderson, C.M., Baranova, D.V., Wang, H.Y. & Pelletier, E. 2020: Late Pennsylvanian–Early Permian tectonically-driven stratigraphic sequences and carbonate sedimentation along northern margin of Sverdrup Basin (Otto Fiord Depression), Arctic Canada. InHenderson, C.M., Ritter, S. & Snyder, W.S. (eds), Late Paleozoic Tectonostratigraphy and Biostratigraphy of Western Pangea. SEPM Special Publication no. 113, https://doi.org/10.2110/sepmsp.113
von Bitter, P.H. & Merrill, G.K. 1983: Late Palaeozoic species of Ellisonia (Conodontophorida), evolutionary and palaeoecological significance. Royal Ontario Museum, Life Sciences Contributions 136, 1–56.
Boardman, D.R. II, Wardlaw, B.R. & Nestell, M.K. 2009: Stratigraphy and conodont biostratigraphy of the uppermost Carboniferous and Lower Permian from the North American Midcontinent. Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin, 255, 1–145.
Chernykh, V.V. 2005: Zonal Method and Biostratigraphy. Ekaterinberg, Russian Academy of Sciences, Urals Division, Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, 217 pp. (in Russian).
Chernykh, V.V. 2006: Lower Permian Conodonts of the Urals. Ekaterinberg, Russian Academy of Sciences, Urals Division, Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, 130 pp. (in Russian).
Clark, D.L. 1974: Factors of Early Permian conodont paleoecology in Nevada. Journal of Paleontology 48, 710–720.
Condon, S.M. 1997: Geology of the Pennsylvanian and Permian cutler group and Permian Kaibab limestone in the Paradox Basin, southeastern Utah and southwestern Colorado (No. 2000). US Government Printing Office.
Cross, W. & Howe, E. 1905: Red beds of southwestern Colorado and their correlation. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 16, 447–498.
Davis, L.E. & Webster, G.D. 1985: Late Mississippian to Early Pennsylvanian conodont biofacies in central Montana. Lethaia 18, 67–72.
DiMichele, W.A., Cecil, C.B., Chaney, D.S., Elrick, S.D. & Nelson, W.J. 2014: Fossil floras from the Pennsylvanian-Permian Cutler Group of southeastern Utah. Utah Geological Association, Publication 43: Geology of Utah's Far South, 491–504.
Driese, S.G., Carr, T.R. & Clark, D.L. 1984: Quantitative analysis of Pennsylvanian shallow-water conodont biofacies, Utah and Colorado. Conodont biofacies and provincialism. Edited by DL Clark. The Geological Society of America Special Paper 196, 233–250.
Dubiel, R.F., Huntoon, J.E., Stanesco, J.D. & Condon, S.M. 2009: Cutler Group alluvial, eolian, and marine deposystems: Permian facies relations and climatic variability in the Paradox Basin. In Houston, W.S., Wray, L.L. & Moreland, P.G. (eds): The Paradox Basin Revisited: New Developments in Petroleum Systems and Basin Analysis, 265–308. Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists.
Gay, R., Huttenlocker, A.K., Irmis, R.B.J., Stegner, M.A. & Uglesich, J. (2020): Paleontology of the Bears Ears National Monument: history of exploration and designation of the monument. Geology of the Intermountain West 7, 205–241.
Golab, J.A., Smith, J.J. & Hasiotis, S.T. 2018: Paleoenvironmental and paleogeographic implications of paleosols and ichnofossils in the Upper Pennsylvanian Halgaito Formation, southeastern Utah. Palaios 33, 296–311.
Gose, W.A. & Helsley, C.E. 1972: Paleomagnetic and rock-magnetic studies of the Permian Cutler and Elephant Canyon Formations in Utah. Journal of Geophysical Research 77, 1534–1548.
Henderson, C.M.1989: Conodont Paleontology and Biostratigraphy of the Upper Carboniferous to Lower Permian Canyon Fiord, Belcher Channel, an Unnamed, and Van Hauen formations, Canadian Archipelago. Unpublished Thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, 287 pp.
Henderson, C.M.2018: Permian conodont biostratigraphy. InLucas, S.G. & Shen, S.Z. (eds) The Permian Timescale: Geological Society, London, Special Publications 450, 119–142.
Henderson, C.M., Pinard, S. & Beauchamp, B. 1995: Biostratigraphic and sequence stratigraphic relationships of Upper Carboniferous conodont and foraminifer distribution, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 43, 226–246.
Herrmann, A.D., Barrick, J.E. & Algeo, T.J. 2015: The relationship of conodont biofacies to spatially variable water mass properties in the Late Pennsylvanian Midcontinent Sea. Paleoceanography 30, 269–283.
Huttenlocker, A.K., Henrici, A., Nelson, W.J., Elrick, S., Berman, D.S., Schlotterbeck, T. & Sumida, S.S. 2018: A multitaxic bonebed near the Carboniferous-Permian boundary (Halgaito Formation, Cutler Group) in Valley of the Gods, Utah, USA: Vertebrate paleontology and taphonomy. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 499, 72–92.
Krainer, K. & Lucas, S.G. 2013: The Pennsylvanian-Permian Bursum Formation in central New Mexico. The Carboniferous-Permian transition in Central New Mexico: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, Bulletin 59, 143–160.
Krainer, K., Lucas, S.G. & Kues, B. 2003: Upper Pennsylvanian strata in the Zuni Mountains, west-central New Mexico. In Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 35, no. 5, p. 38.
Loope, D.B., Sanderson, G.A. & Verville, G.J. 1990: Abandonment of the name Elephant Canyon Formation in southeastern Utah: physical and temporal implications. Mountain Geologist 27, 119–130.
Lucas, S.G. 2006: Global Permian tetrapod biostratigraphy and biochronology. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 265, 65–93.
Lucas, S.G. 2018: Permian tetrapod biochronology, correlation and evolutionary events. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 450, 405–444.
Lucas, S.G., Barrick, J., Krainer, K. & Schneider, J.W. 2013: The Carboniferous-Permian boundary at Carrizo Arroyo, Central New Mexico, USA. Stratigraphy 10, 153–170.
Mountney, N.P. & Jagger, A. 2004: Stratigraphic evolution of an aeolian erg margin system: the Permian Cedar Mesa Sandstone, SE Utah, USA. Sedimentology 51, 713–743.
Nakrem, H.A. 1991: Conodonts from the Permian succession of Bjornoya (Svalbard). Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift 71, 235–248.
Orchard, M.J. & Forster, P.J.L. 1988: Permian conodont Biostratigraphy of the Harper Ranch beds, near Kamloops, southern-central British Columbia. Geological Survey of Canada Paper 88, 1–27.
Orchard, M.J., Lucas, S.G. & Krainer, K. 2004: Conodonts and the age of the Red Tanks Member of the Bursum Formation at Carrizo Arroyo, central New Mexico. InLucas, S.G. & Ziegler, K.E. (eds), Carboniferous-Permian transition, New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 25, 123–126.
Orkild, P.P.1955: Photogeologic map of the Bluff-6 quadrangle, San Juan County, Utah: US Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map I-53 scale 1: 24,000. 1955b, Photogeologic map of the Bluff-5 quadrangle, San Juan County, Utah. US Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map I-60, scale, 1(24,000).
O'Sullivan, R.B. 1965: Geology of the Cedar Mesa-Boundary Butte area, San Juan County. Utah. U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1186, 1–128.
Pinard, S. & Mamet, B. 1998: Taxonomy of small foraminifers of the Upper Carboniferous to Lower Permian, Sverdrup Basin, Arctic Canada. Palaeontographica Canadiana 15, 1-253. (in French).
Ritter, S.M. 1995: Upper Missourian – Lower Wolfcampian (upper Kasimovian-lower Asselian) conodont biostratigraphy of the midcontinent, U.S.A. Journal of Paleontology 69, 1139–1154.
Ritter, S.M., Barrick, J.E. & Skinner, M.R. 2002: Conodont sequence biostratigraphy of the Hermosa Group (Pennsylvanian) at Honaker Trail, Paradox Basin, Utah. Journal of Paleontology 76, 495–517.
Samira, T.N., Payman, R., Reza, M.H. & Mohammad, K. 2018: Shell concentrations analysis in the Lower Permian carbonate rocks (Khan Formation) in Central Iran (Kalmard area). Historical Biology 32, 1–14.
Sanderson, G.A. & Verville, G.J. 1990: Fusulinid Zonation of the General Petroleum No. 45–54 Core, Emery County, Utah. The Mountain Geologist 27, 131–136.
Sears, J. D. (1956). Geology of Comb Ridge and vicinity north of San Juan River, San Juan County, Utah. U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1021-E 167–207.
Schmitz, M.D. & Davydov, V.I. 2012: Quantitative radiometric and biostratigraphic calibration of the Pennsylvanian-Early Permian (Cisuralian) time scale and pan-Euromerican chronostratigraphic correlation. Geological Society of America Bulletin 124, 549–577.
Scott, K.M. 2013: Carboniferous-Permian boundary in the Halgaito Formation, Cutler Group, Valley of the Gods and surrounding area, southeastern Utah. The Carboniferous-Permian Transition. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 60, 398–409.
Sobolev, N.N. & Nakrem, H.A. 1996: Middle Carboniferous-Lower Permian conodonts of Novaya Zemlya. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter 199, 128 pp.
Soreghan, G.S., Elmore, R.D. & Lewchuk, M.T. 2002a: Sedimentologic-magnetic record of western Pangean climate in upper Paleozoic loessite (lower Cutler beds, Utah). Geological Society of America Bulletin 114, 1019–1035.
Soreghan, M.J., Soreghan, G.S. & Hamilton, M.A. 2002b: Paleowinds inferred from detrital-zircon geochronology of upper Paleozoic loessite, western equatorial Pangea. Geology 30, 695–698.
Sumida, S.S., Albright, G.M., Rega, E.A. & Gillette, D.D. 1999a: Late Paleozoic fishes of Utah. Vertebrate paleontology of Utah. Geological Survey of Utah Miscellaneous Publication 99, 13–20.
Sumida, S.S., Lombard, R.E., Berman, D.S. & Henrici, A.C. 1999: Late Paleozoic amniotes and their near relatives from Utah and northeastern Arizona, with comments on the Permian-Pennsylvanian boundary in Utah and northeast Arizona. Utah Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Publications 99, 31–43.
Sumida, S.S., Walliser, J.B. & Lombard, R.E. 1999: Late Paleozoic amphibian-grade tetrapods of Utah. Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publications 99, 21–30.
Vaughn, P.P. 1962: Vertebrates from the Halgaito Tongue of the Cutler Formation, Permian of San Juan County, Utah. Journal of Paleontology 36, 529–539.
Vaughn, P.P. 1967: Evidence of ossified vertebrae in actinopterygian fish of early Permian age, from southeastern Utah. Journal of Paleontology 41, 151–160.
Vaughn, P.P. 1969: Lower Permian vertebrates of the Four Corners and the Midcontinent as indices of climatic differences. In Proceedings of the North American Paleontological Congress, 388–408.
Vaughn, P.P. 1973: Vertebrates from the Cutler Group of Monument Valley and vicinity. In Guidebook of Monument Valley and vicinity, Arizona and Utah: Socorro, New Mexico Geological Society 24th Field Conference, 99–105.
Wamsteeker, M.L.2009: Sequence Stratigraphy, Conodont Biostratigraphy and Sedimentology of Lower Permian Strata of the Fosheim-Hamilton Sub–basin, Sverdrup Basin, Ellesmere Island, Canadian Arctic. Unpublished MSc thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary.
Wardlaw, B.R. 2005: Age assignment of the Pennsylvanian-Early Permian succession of north central Texas. Permophiles 46, 21–22.
Wardlaw, B.R. & Nestell, M.K. 2014: The first appearance of Streptognathodus isolatus in the Permian of Texas. Permophiles 59, 17–20.
Wengerd, S.A. 1950: Photogeologic characteristics of Paleozoic rocks on the Monument Upwarp, Utah. Photogrammetric Engineering 16, 770–781.
Zubin-Stathopoulos, K.D., Beauchamp, B., Davydov, V.I. & Henderson, C.M. 2013: Variability of Pennsylvanian-Permian carbonate associations and implications for NW Pangea Palaeogeography, east-central British Columbia, Canada. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 376, 47–72.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 Lethaia Foundation.
All rights reserved.
History
Received: 27 March 2020
Accepted: 13 August 2020
Published online: 22 October 2020
Issue date: 1 July 2021
Data archiving statement
No digital online data were curated for this study. Please contact the corresponding author ([email protected]) or local land managers of the U.S. Bureau of Land Management for detailed locality information.
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
Crossref Cited-by
- Paleozoic Equatorial Records of Melting Ice Ages (PERMIA): calibrating the pace of paleotropical environmental and ecological change during Earth's previous icehouse, Scientific Drilling.
- Report of a Diverse Vertebrate Body Fossil Assemblage in the Maroon Formation (Carboniferous–Permian), Eagle County, Colorado, U.S.A., Annals of Carnegie Museum.
- Halgaitosaurus gregarius, a New Upper Carboniferous Araeoscelidian (Reptilia: Diapsida) from the Halgaito Formation, Bears Ears National Monument, Utah, USA, Annals of Carnegie Museum.
- Middle to Late Pennsylvanian tetrapod evolution: the Kasimovian bottleneck, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.
- Evolutionary patterns in Late Pennsylvanian conodonts, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.