Oppgrader til nyeste versjon av Internet eksplorer for best mulig visning av siden. Klikk her for for å skjule denne meldingen
Ikke pålogget
{{session.user.firstName}} {{session.user.lastName}}
Du har tilgang til Idunn gjennom , & {{sessionPartyGroup.name}}
Editorial
Åpen tilgang
(side 3-5)
av Rune Johan Krumsvik
Åpen tilgang
Vitenskapelig publikasjon
(side 6-22)
av Even Einum
Sammendrag

Response technology (RT) is frequently applied to engage students in education, but research on RT has only perfunctorily studied student involvement in decision-making in secondary education. Because such research is also scarce in language learning, this study aimed to identify and examine how students and teachers experience student-centring of language teaching through RT-mediated involvement. A qualitative-dominant, mixed-methods case study design provided data through observations, interviews, and surveys, which was analysed through constant comparative coding and categorisation, descriptive statistics, and analytic abduction. This identified two forms of involvement—active and passive—which entered into a dynamic, student-centring, relationship-guiding practice, and between which teachers’ and students’ decision-making roles varied. By combining RT and involvement, this study provides an introduction to an area of research which may further unlock the potential of RT for student-centring of education.

Åpen tilgang
Vitenskapelig publikasjon
(side 23-36)
av Lillian Gran, Daniel Petterson og Christina Elde Mølstad
Sammendrag

The aim of this paper is to elaborate on how students perceive their own learning and democratic development in relation to their digital interactions and competencies. This paper seeks an understanding of students’ perspectives on digital Bildung. We investigate these issues by comparing different notions of Bildung perspectives among young students from four Norwegian schools. The study consists of interviews with 12 focus groups of 3 students in each. The results indicate that the students experienced unwanted interference by the teachers during the school day, and that they felt a lack of democratic involvement in social conflicts, digital usages and other daily forms of decision-making. Further, the interviews indicated that students perceived their teachers as biased when it came to helping students in situations of bullying or other relationship challenges. In investigating digital interactions and competencies among Norwegian students, we identified a visible gap in the notion of Bildung and identity development between the students and the teachers. This finding suggests a need to further discuss the role of students in creating a better school system based on democratic ideals.

Åpen tilgang
Vitenskapelig publikasjon
(side 37-53)
av Hanne Maria Bingen, Bodil Tveit, Rune Johan Krumsvik og Simen A. Steindal
Sammendrag

Digitisation has become a part of quality education and can help change the teacher’s role from a lecturer to a supervisor, encourage a more student-centred approach, and increase the interactivity between the teacher and the students. However, it can be challenging to facilitate more interactive pedagogy in large classes. The aim of this study was to gain knowledge about nursing students’ experience with the use of a student response system (SRS) in learning activities when learning physiology. This study was conducted at a university college in Norway, which offers Bachelor of Nursing degrees. In the Anatomy and Physiology course, a flipped classroom design, including the use of an SRS, was offered to nursing students. Data were collected in 2014 using focus group interviews with six students who were enrolled in the course and analysed using systematic text condensation. From this, four categories emerged describing the students’ experiences with how the use of the SRS can support their learning: 1) creating a welcoming and stimulating learning environment, 2) encouraging participation in learning activities on campus, 3) facilitating collaboration on campus and 4) motivating students to study before and after on-campus meetings. The findings indicate that an SRS can be combined with different pedagogical strategies. Additionally, teachers should be aware of what kind of questions facilitate participation in polls versus those that are perceived as too challenging. New university college students studying within a flipped classroom design may struggle to prepare adequately before class meetings and need guidance from the teacher to handle both a new teaching approach and a new student role.

Åpen tilgang
Vitenskapelig publikasjon
(side 54-69)
av Chaka Chaka
Sammendrag

This paper seeks to explore and re-imagine the notion of literacy, by first reconceptualising it in its plural form as literacies, and second, by embedding it within the context of semio-technologies. From this basis, and employing interface theory, it contends that imagination serves as a launching pad for literacies, semio-technologies and literacies pedagogy. The paper also argues that in its plural form, literacies does not only entail the critical literacies, New Literacy Studies, new literacies and multiliteracies perspectives, but also encompasses other literacy permutations, such as multicultural literacies, pluralistic literacies, globalised literacies, digital literacies, mobile literacies, data literacies and high literacies. In addition, it proposes how literacies can be incorporated into school curricula and taught in both primary and secondary school contexts. It suggests three models (standalone, infusion and cross-cutting models) for curriculating literacies. Lastly, the paper characterises the changing nature of learners and the changing roles of teachers in view of ever-evolving literacies.

Åpen tilgang
Vitenskapelig publikasjon
(side 70-87)
av Kjetil Egelandsdal og Rune Johan Krumsvik
Sammendrag

The article presents a mixed methods study on clicker interventions conducted in collaboration with four philosophy teachers at fourteen university lectures. The aim was to examine how feedback from the interventions were received and used by teachers and students. The data material comprises a quasi-experiment based on 6,772 student responses, student logs, a student survey and semi-structured interviews with the teachers. Findings show that students experience feedback that supports their self-monitoring and understanding of the content, and that the peer discussions enhanced student performance. The teachers also experienced an increased awareness of the students’ understanding of the topics. Yet, the findings indicate a gap between the reception and use of the feedback.

1–2-2019, Volume 14

www.idunn.no/dk

Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy (NJDL) is aimed at researchers, school authorities, school leaders in primary and secondary schools, teachers in primary and secondary education, at colleges and universities, and others concerned with education and ICT.

The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, conference papers, debates and commentaries, software and book reviews. Through dissemination of national and international research, the journal contributes to the debate on education policy. The journal aims at creating a platform for the critical analysis of digital literacy and competence, and the use of ICT in educational context. Moreover the aim is to stimulate dialogue between different participants in the field. Upon reception, the editor evaluates all submissions. After editor screening, approved contributions are sent to at least two anonymous international reviewers.

Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy has a focus on articles that deal thematically with digital literacy and the use of ICT in educational settings. Papers can among others be targeted on the following themes:

  • ICT use and innovation in education

  • Theoretical, methodological and practical challenges around the use of ICT in education

  • ICT in subjects (didactic context)

  • Evaluation and development

  • Learners’ work and learners’ ICT skills

  • Teachers, teacher education and classroom management

  • Lifelong learning

Editor-in-Chief

Rune Johan Krumsvik

Editorial assistants

Helga Hommedal Blikås

Øystein Olav Skaar

Editorial team

Ann-Thérèse Arstorp

Greta Bjork Gudmundsdottir

Kjetil Egelandsdal

Kjetil L. Høydal

Cathrine E. Tomte

Fredrik Mork Røkenes

Ove Edvard Hatlevik

Lise Øen Jones

Massimo Loi

Morten Søby

Editorial board

Claire Bélisle

Alain Breuleux

Kirsten Drotner

Ola Erstad

Patrik Hernwall

Michael Hoechsmann

Solveig Jakobsdottir

Michele Knobel

Colin Lankshear

Sanna Järvelä

Nancy Law

Angela McFarlane

Roger Säljö

Marlene Scardamalia

Birgitte Holm Sørensen

Barbara Wasson

Patricia Wastiau

Design: Type It AS

Typeset: Bøk Oslo AS

ISSN online: 1891-943X

DOI: 10.18261/issn.1891-943X

The journal is published in collaboration with the Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training

© Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget 2019

Idunn bruker informasjonskapsler (cookies). Ved å fortsette å bruke nettsiden godtar du dette. Klikk her for mer informasjon